The plaintiff has referred me to the case of Fallis v. Fallis [1995] B.C.J. No. 1197, where Hunter J. revisited the order for sale of a family asset he had made at trial, and decided he had jurisdiction to make a compensation order. It is not stated in the decision whether the original judgment was made the subject of an entered order and the reasoning for the decision on jurisdiction is not set out, so it is not a persuasive authority, particularly in view of the distinguishing fact that this application is not before the trial judge.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.