The test to be applied in determining whether a physician exercised the appropriate standard of care is an objective one. A description of this objective test was set out by Rand J. in Wilson v. Swanson (1956), 1956 CanLII 1 (SCC), 5 D.L.R. (2d) 113, at page 120: ... The test can be no more than this: was the decision the result of the exercise of the surgical intelligence professed? Or was what was done such that, disregarding it may be the exceptional case or individual, in all the circumstances, at least the preponderant opinion of the group would have been against it? If a substantial opinion confirms it, there is no breach or failure. ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.