In this decision the court identified the factors that are relevant to the analysis, and at para. 20 quoted La Forest J. in Hunt v. T&N plc, 1993 CanLII 43 (SCC), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 289, 109 D.L.R. (4th) 16 at 326 wherein he stated: 59 ... the assumption of and the discretion not to exercise jurisdiction must ultimately be guided by the requirements of order and fairness, not a mechanical counting of contacts or connections. ... The factors identified by the court relevant to the analysis are: 1. Balance of convenience and expense for the parties and witnesses; 2. Law to be applied; 3. Desirability of avoiding multiplicity of proceedings; 4. Avoiding conflicting decisions in different courts; 5. Enforcement of eventual judgment; 6. Fair and efficient working of the Canadian legal system as a whole; 7. Unilateral or wrongful removal of the child; 8. Geographical factors; 9. Legitimate juridical advantage; and 10. Fairness. At para. 43 the court concluded:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.