The general rule is that an examination for discovery is in the nature of a cross-examination except that it is limited to the issues raised by the pleadings and “any question is permissible the answer to which may be relevant to the issues” per Hunter C.J. in Hopper v. Dunsmuir (No. 2) (1903), 19 B.C.R. 23 at 27. The test is whether the answer “may” be relevant, not whether it “must” be relevant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.