What is the scope of examination for discovery under the current BCSC Rules?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kaladjian v. Jose, 2012 BCSC 357 (CanLII):
In Kendall v. Sun Life Assurance company of Canada, 2010 BCSC 1556 [Kendall], Griffin J. considered the scope of examination for discovery under the present Rules when compared to that under the former Rules. She found that it remains unchanged and is very broad.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can counsel for the party being examined on examination for discovery interfere on cross-examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant continue to examine for discovery after an examination for discovery has been adjourned? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of the discretion of the Court of Appeal under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law with respect to the scope and scope of a document request? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for granting an independent examination under Rule 30(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the word "wilful delay or default" in Rule 52(5) of Rule 52 of the Rules of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Court, can an independent medical examination be ordered for the purposes of determining whether an individual is fit for purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
