The applicable test for a court considering a motion for an interlocutory injunction is set out in RJR-MacDonald v. Canada (Attorney General), 1994 CanLII 117 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311, 111 D.L.R. (4th) 385 as follows: 1. Is there a serious question to be tried? 2. Will the moving party suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted? and 3. Does the balance of convenience favour the granting of an injunction?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.