The fixing of lump sum costs however is to be made in accordance with the tariff, given the intent of subrule (14) to avoid further costs, not to broaden judicial discretion. The exception is when an order for special costs is made. The discretion to assess costs in the latter arises from Rule 16-1(b) and the inherent jurisdiction of the court (Buchan v. Moss Management Inc., 2010 BCCA 393 at para. 12)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.