Does a statement made in a quasi-judicial proceeding constitute absolute privilege?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zanetti v. Bonnihon Enterprises Ltd., 2002 BCSC 1203 (CanLII):

The proposition that irrelevant and allegedly defamatory statements made or introduced in the quasi-judicial proceedings do not attract absolute privilege was expressly rejected in Kosendiak v. Parsons, [1993] B.C.J. No. 1579 at paragraph 23.

Other Questions


Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege extend to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an independent statement privileged in the context of solicitor-and-client privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between qualified privilege and absolute privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is absolute privilege attached to statements made in court? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to communications by lawyers in respect of judicial proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an occasion of qualified privilege where a statement was given to a person who had an interest or duty to make the statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to statements made by a lawyer in the course of representing a client? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that there is a discrepancy between what occurred in a proceeding and what happened in the proceeding defeat privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.