Even where this relaxed test may apply, however, the merits of the relief requested by the plaintiffs become a fundamental consideration to their entitlement to leave: see Carlton v. Beaverton Hotel.[12] Here it is plain that the Plaintiffs do not meet even a relaxed application of the "substantial unexpected change in circumstances" test. They have not provided evidence of any change in circumstances, whether substantial, unexpected or otherwise, to explain bringing this motion two years after setting the action down for trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.