It is understood that the submission of the husband is that this money was a gift to both parties. He cites Gain v. Gain, 2010 BCSC 1832, where money advanced was found not to be a loan (although part of the money was found to be a gift to only one party, leading to reapportionment), and Maclean v. Milo, 2010 BCSC 1109, where money advanced was found not to be a loan (and was found to be a gift to one party, but in all the circumstances did not lead to reapportionment). The husband submits that nothing short of a fully secured mortgage will be considered a valid loan.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.