In Locke v. Locke, 2000 BCSC 1300, [2000] B.C.J. No. 1850 (S.C.) the court distilled from a number of authorities the following list of factors which may be applied in determining whether an advance was a loan or a gift: 1. whether there were any contemporaneous documents evidencing a loan; 2. whether the manner for repayment is specified; 3. whether there is security held for the loan; 4. whether there are advances to one child and not others, or advances of unequal amounts to various children; 5. whether there has been any partial repayment; and 6. whether there was any expectation, or likelihood, of repayment.
In Buddingh v. Pilon, 2002 BCSC 1123, [2002] B.C.J. No. 1762 Gray J. referred to Locke v. Locke and also noted two further factors; the absence of any demand for payment before the separation of the parties and the failure to disclose the “loan” in credit applications.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.