The defendant relies on Locke v. Locke 2000 BCSC 1300 for the proposition that money advanced from the parents of a married person to be used for a family purpose should, upon divorce, be presumed to have been a gift, unless there is clear evidence to the contrary. Some of the factors to be considered are set out at para. 20 of that case: 1. whether there were any contemporaneous documents evidencing a loan; 2. whether the manner for repayment is specified; 3. whether there is security held for the loan; 4. whether there are advances to one child and not others, or advances of unequal amounts to various children; 5. whether there has been any demand for payment before the separation of the parties; 6. whether there has been any partial repayment; and 7. whether there was any expectation, or likelihood, of repayment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.