Generally the standard of review varies according to the nature of the error that is alleged to have been committed by the administrative body and a spectrum exists pursuant to which decisions rendered at one end of the spectrum will be interfered with if the decision is said to be patently unreasonable and decisions at the other end must be correct. (See Pezim v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Brokers), 1994 CanLII 103 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 557, 114 D.L.R. (4th) 385.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.