What is the standard of review for the purposes of determining whether a decision should be reviewed in a civil proceeding?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Michael Zygocki Ltd. v. The Corporation of the town of Whitby, 2002 CanLII 17813 (ON SCDC):
The standard of review is correctness. Dell Holdings v. Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority (1997), 1997 CanLII 400 (SCC), 142 D.L.R. (4th) 206 (S.C.C.) at pp. 224-5.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a trier of fact have to consider standard of care before determining whether there has been a breach of the standard or otherwise? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for determining whether a person has capacity to refuse treatment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of an administrative decision? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied to a review of an assessment officer’s decision? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purposes of determining the validity of a claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors used by the courts to determine whether or not a portion of pre-tax corporate income should be included in a party's income for support purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a Minister's refusal to disclose records on a standard of correctness? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard for appellate review of a jury verdict in a civil case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an associate judge's decision? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered control and access to the area in question in determining whether the public had access and invited to use the area on the private property for parking purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
