It is common ground that the standard of review of the adjudicator’s decision confirming the driving prohibition requires the court to determine whether the decision was reasonable. Counsel agree that this standard requires deference to the adjudicator’s decision, and asks, in part, whether the decision “falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law”: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190, at para. 47.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.