In cases such as this one where the review is concerned with an adjudicator’s findings of fact, or of mixed fact and law, the courts have affirmed that reasonableness is the appropriate standard of review. As noted by Groberman J.A. in Mitchell v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2009 BCCA 272, at para. 18: It is important to note that most of the decisions of adjudicators on administrative driving prohibitions deal with questions of fact or questions of mixed fact and law. It is for this reason that the courts have generally found it appropriate to grant deference to those decisions.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.