It is generally “inappropriate for a trial court to determine the standard of care in a professional negligence case in the absence of expert evidence”: See Krawchuk v. Scherbak, 2011 ONCA 352, 106 O.R. (3d) 598, at para. 130, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused (2011), 297 O.A.C. 395. Two exceptions were recognized, in cases involving: a. “[N]ontechnical matters of those of which an ordinary person may be expected to have knowledge” (at paras. 133-134); and b. “[I]mpugned actions of the defendant that are so egregious that it is obvious that his or her conduct has fallen below the standard of care, even without knowing precisely the parameters of that standard” (at para. 135).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.