Finally, in a medical negligence case, the court should have before it some expert evidence in order to find that a breach of the standard of care caused damages to the plaintiff. As was held in Claus v. Wolfman:[34] The court ought not to be asked to make a finding that an expert or experts (the defendants) failed to meet the standard required of them by their professional peers and that their malpractice was the cause or a significant causative factor in the plaintiff's injury, in the absence of evidence of what the standard is and without the expression of even a guarded professional opinion that the defendants' conduct may have been a causal factor.[35]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.