20 In Jacks v. Davis, supra, the solicitor had not received any of the secret profit. Prior to judgment being granted against the solicitor, the secret profit had been paid over to the plaintiff by the person who had received it. The judgment against the solicitor took into account the disgorgement of the secret profit by its recipient, but as the trial judge found that the value of the property was well below the amount paid by the developer before the "flip", the judgment awarded against the solicitor was substantial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.