57 Lord Goff of Chieveley said the issue was whether in such cases solicitors are liable to the intended beneficiaries who, as a result of the solicitors' negligence, have failed to receive the benefit intended by the testator. He noted that although Ross v. Caunters was generally welcomed by academic writers and, as far as he knew, had created no serious problems in practice since it was decided 15 years earlier, nevertheless the case had been recognized to raise difficulties of a conceptual nature resulting in an uneasy accommodation of the decision within the ordinary principles of the law of obligations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.