The Seed Hawk Defendants argued that the provision in the Costs Decision for fees for second counsel precluded a non-lawyer, such as the patent agent. If he had been a lawyer, recovery if any would be limited to the partial indemnity limits of the tariff and not full indemnity by way of the device of a disbursement. Authorities such as J.M. Voith GmbH v. Beloit Corp., [1990] F.C.J. No. 1083 (F.C.T.D.) have held such disbursements to be non-recoverable overhead.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.