The following excerpt is from Fox v. Fox, 188 N.E. 160, 263 N.Y. 68 (N.Y. 1933):
[263 N.Y. 71]There is nothing in Lake v. Lake, supra, in conflict with this conclusion. In that case the judgment of divorce contained no provision at all relating to alimony. Six months after the entry of final judgment, application was made among other things to insert such a provision. As the statute (Code Civ. Proc. 1771) then stood, there was no authority to do that. Such authority came only with the enactment of chapter 240 of the Laws of 1925 (now Civil Practice Act, 1170). With no authority, either statutory or by reservation, to deal with alimony after judgment, the court was without jurisdiction to grant counsel fees and properly so held.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.