Moving to the second stage of the two-step test, the judge emphasized s. 8 only protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Citing British Columbia Securities Commission v. Branch, 1995 CanLII 142 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3, he noted that, absent prior judicial authorization, a search or seizure will be unreasonable unless: (i) it is authorized by law; (ii) the authorizing law itself is reasonable; and (iii) it is carried out in a reasonable manner. He found that the Rule 4-55 order was authorized by the Legal Profession Act and the Law Society Rules. Then, he turned to the key question: whether the authorizing law was reasonable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.