Thus, before s. 490(15) comes into play, a determination has already been made that an entry onto private property, an invasive search of premises, and a seizure of items and/or information is justified. In those circumstances, the “state’s interest in detecting and preventing crime ... [prevails] over the individual’s interest in being left alone ...” because “credibly based probability” has replaced suspicion (Hunter v. Southam at 167).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.