Given the apportioned liability with respect to the Second Accident, the material difference between the Rule 37 Offer and my award, and the approach set out in Smith v. Knudsen, 2004 BCCA 613 (CanLII), I conclude that costs should be apportioned as they pertain to the Second Accident. The defendants are to pay the plaintiff 90% of his costs and disbursements to January 3, 2003 and the plaintiff is to pay the defendants their costs and disbursements from January 3, 2003.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.