Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Chiaramonte v Chiaramonte, 2016 ONSC 7328 (CanLII):
In Myles v. Reed [2003] O. J. No. 848, Agro J. concluded that the applicant had wilfully ignored orders of the court and had frustrated the respondent’s ability to have a timely trial of the issues. The respondent’s ability to properly and thoroughly prepare for trial had been compromised by the withholding of financial information and the fulfillment of undertakings (para. 16). The applicant’s pleadings with respect to financial issues were struck.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.