What is the test for assuming that material facts in a notice of civil claim must be assumed to be true?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Owimar v Warnett, 2018 BCSC 2310 (CanLII):

The rule that material facts in a notice of civil claim must be assumed to be true does not mean that allegations based on assumptions and speculation must be taken as true. Rather, such allegations must be subjected to a skeptical analysis in order to determine their true character: Young v. Borzoni et al, 2007 BCCA 16 at paras. 25-32.

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff proceed on the basis that the allegations set out in the notice of civil claim are true? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assuming and speculation in a notice of civil claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a wilfully false statement in a motor vehicle accident claim constitute material material to another claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant material facts in a pleading under Rule 3-7(18) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a defendant asserts that the facts in the impugned statements are not true or substantially true and/or fair comment, can they be privileged in a defamation action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will Mainstream bring its amended notice of civil claim against the GAAIA? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for striking a notice of civil claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a strike in a notice of civil claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can Rule 9-6 of the Rules of Civil Procedure allow summary dismissal of a claim where there are disputed facts in the pleadings? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.