In Regina Cartage & Storage Co. Ltd. v. Regina (City) (1967), 1967 CanLII 396 (SK QB), 61 W.W.R. 443 (Sask.), it was pointed out and I respectfully agree, that the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330, did not apply in the case of a company authorized by statute to lay down water pipes. It was also held that as the municipality was under a statutory duty to care for and maintain its public works it was not liable for damage caused by a broken water main unless negligence was proved.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.