The respondent’s position that the respondent’s relationship with his minor children should be considered in determining whether the child is a child of the marriage has no support in the jurisprudence. I find all the children in this case are under the age of majority and remain financially dependent. Any child under the age of majority who remains financially dependent remains a child of the marriage. [Marsh v. Marsh, 2006 BCCA 144, para. 52.]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.