[17] The respondent acknowledges that this was not his first impaired driving charge. He was charged in the late 1980’s, to the best of his recollection. The charge was stayed as a result of the decision in The Queen v. Askov, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1199, 113 N.R. 241, 75 O.R. (2d) 673, 42 O.A.C. 81, 74 D.L.R. (4th) 355, 49 C.R.R. 1, 59 C.C.C. (3d) 449, 79 C.R. (3d) 273, 1990 CanLII 45, [1990] S.C.J. No. 106, 1990 CarswellOnt 111. The respondent’s licence was reinstated in May 2001.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.