The respondent seeks a “lump sum award of 90% of [her] legal expenses”. I have no evidence of those expenses. In Gichuru v. Smith, 2014 BCCA 414, the court disapproved the practice of judges awarding costs in a lump sum. I am not invited by the respondent to fix the amount of costs by conducting my own assessment, and I do not understand the respondent to be using the expression “lump sum” in that manner. In my view the appropriate approach in this application is that the order should say no more than that the respondent is entitled to special costs to be assessed. The petitioners’ application for special costs is dismissed. “Affleck J.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.