The following excerpt is from Norouzi v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2017 FC 368 (CanLII):
The respondent maintains that the case law on this issue is not contentious, and cites, among others, Balouch v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2015 FC 765, [2015] FCJ no 751. In this decision, Justice Heneghan concluded as follows: While I acknowledge that the existence of risk is a primary concern when protection is sought, I am not persuaded that the issue of risk is relevant in a cessation hearing.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.