What are the reasons that follow in the context of a human rights case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from British Columbia Teachers' Federation v. British Columbia Public School Employers' Association, 2005 BCCA 92 (CanLII):
"The reasons that follow" were largely reasons based on McLeod v. Egan. The word "incorporated" was chosen by Mr. Justice Iacobucci in the first sentence of paragraph 23 rather than "as if they were part of the collective agreement" which were the words that he chose in paragraph 1, though in the second sentence of paragraph 23, which I have emphasized, the employer's right to manage or direct the workforce is said to be subject to the express provisions of the collective agreement and the statutory provisions of the Human Rights Code and other employer-related statutes. It does not say that the statutory provisions need only be applied if they are "incorporated" in the collective agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the meaning of the language of the Canadian Human Rights Code in the context of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases dealing with time limits in human rights cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the definition of an Aboriginal right been interpreted in the context of Aboriginal rights cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for limiting the right to publication of a human rights case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable grounds in the context of privacy protection cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In an aboriginal rights and title case, how have the courts considered expert evidence in aboriginal cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
