The representative also considered Palmer v. The Queen 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 759, which held that new evidence is admissible on appeal when: 1) even by due diligence, it could not reasonably have been adduced at trial; 2) it is relevant; 3) it is credible in the sense that it is reasonably capable of belief; and 4) if believed, it could reasonably, when taken with the other evidence adduced at trial, be expected to have affected the result. (See p. 775.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.