The appellant now seeks to adduce this evidence on appeal. We dismiss the application. It was open to the appellant to pursue this issue in the manner suggested by the trial judge. It is evident from the record that defence counsel at trial made a tactical decision not to pursue the issue. There is no suggestion that the trial counsel’s representation of the appellant was inadequate. Consequently, the appellant is unable to surmount the due diligence criterion established in Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.