This court in Abdallah v. Snopek, 2008 CanLII 6983 (ON S.C.D.C.) has already found that, where the counsel’s address to a jury is offensive or irrelevant to any issue properly before the jury, designed to inflame emotions rather than appeal to rationality, and where there is a real concern that the jury was thereby improperly swayed in its verdict, the verdict should be set aside and a new trial ordered, even where there is no timely objection raised by counsel. Analysis and Conclusions
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.