10. Addy J. dismissed the respondent's argument based on s. 1(b) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. He said that that provision was not concerned with issues relating to the "mere quantum of remuneration for services rendered". Additionally, following the language of McIntyre J. of this Court in MacKay v. The Queen, 1980 CanLII 217 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 370 at p. 406, he held that the requirement of making contributions for pension and survivor benefits was not "arbitrary, capricious or unnecessary" and therefore did not constitute a denial of equality before the law. Federal Court of Appeal
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.