By the same token, it is also true that a deponent may not be asked about his knowledge about what is contained in documents that are not within his possession or power (Chingee v. The Queen in Right of British Columbia (1989) 38 C.P.C. (2d) 301). Thus, I would reject the argument of the plaintiffs that answers to the interrogatories should be deferred until after the examination for discovery and after the plaintiffs have had an opportunity to review the documents which may or may not be in the possession of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.