Can a deponent be asked about his knowledge about what is contained in a document that is not within his possession or power?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chief Stanley Thomas v. R., 1997 CanLII 2031 (BC SC):

By the same token, it is also true that a deponent may not be asked about his knowledge about what is contained in documents that are not within his possession or power (Chingee v. The Queen in Right of British Columbia (1989) 38 C.P.C. (2d) 301). Thus, I would reject the argument of the plaintiffs that answers to the interrogatories should be deferred until after the examination for discovery and after the plaintiffs have had an opportunity to review the documents which may or may not be in the possession of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of British Columbia.

Other Questions


If there is a fraud on a power, and the trustees attempted to use a power they did not possess, is this court going to rescue the trustees? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a physician required to possess and use that reasonable degree of learning and skill ordinarily possessed by practitioners in similar communities in similar circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the defence argue that the documents sought in this application fall within Rule 7-1(1)(a)(i)? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances can a party to an application request to redact a section of a document that contains a private but clearly irrelevant information? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for counsel to describe documents in a way that would allow the other side to view the documents in the same way? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court admit that two documents sworn and filed in connection with an application for a protection order contain allegations that the complainant may have been influenced by their mother? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for producing documents containing confidential and commercially confidential information? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order that a party provide an affidavit verifying its list of documents when in the absence of any adequate explanation, relevant documents have been omitted from the list? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an individual who acts as an agent of a corporate defendant assert a privilege against self-incrimination when asked to produce documents in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an insurer bound to defend against some of the allegations contained within the coverage of the policy? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.