A double costs award is a punitive measure against a litigant for that party’s failure, in all of the circumstances, to have accepted an offer to settle that should have been accepted. It serves as a reminder that costs rules are in place “to encourage the early settlement of disputes by rewarding the party who makes a reasonable settlement offer and penalizing the party who declines to accept such an offer”: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29 at para. 25. In addition, the purpose of costs rules includes deterring frivolous actions or defences; encouraging conduct that reduces the duration and expense of litigation and discouraging litigation that has the opposite effect; encouraging litigants to settle wherever possible, thus freeing up judicial resources for other cases; and providing a “winnowing function in the litigation process” by requiring litigants to carefully assess the strengths and weaknesses of their cases at the outset and throughout the course of the litigation: Hartshorne at para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.