As they did before the trial judge, the appellants rely on the following passage from the decision of Vout v. Hay, 1995 CanLII 105 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 876, 125 D.L.R. (4th) 431 at para. 26, for their position that the requisite formalities must be proven without the use of the presumption of due execution: Although the propounder of the will has the legal burden with respect to due execution, knowledge and approval, and testamentary capacity, the propounder is aided by a rebuttable presumption. Upon proof that the will was duly executed with the requisite formalities, after having been read over to or by a testator who appeared to understand it, it will generally be presumed that the testator knew and approved of the contents and had the necessary testamentary capacity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.