The applicable procedural safeguards are the following. First, the applicant was entitled to the safeguards recognized in Knight v. Indian Head School Div. No. 19, above, at page 683, namely the right to know the reason(s) for dissatisfaction as well as the right to respond to the reasons for dissatisfaction. These safeguards are the most basic form of the duty to act fairly. Further, my analysis led me to find that the applicant was entitled to enhanced procedural safeguards, namely, the right to a personalized inquiry into the facts by the decision-maker and the right to respond as well as the right to a decision with sufficient reasons. On a broader scale, I believe that the applicant was entitled to participate in a transparent forum and to deal with a decision-maker who played fair.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.