The panel's conclusion regarding the applicant's late pregnancy is made without any evidentiary basis, rather it is based on the panel's own views. It is urged that those views were in turn based on the panel's awareness of Somali culture and tradition, but if that is the case the significance of that culture and those traditions is not explained. All that is said is that it was implausible her husband would wait 16 years after marriage for the birth of a first child. The panel's conclusion was purely speculative. In the recent case of Mahalingam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)1, Mr. Justice Gibson summarized the law relating to speculation as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.