The guiding principles to be considered in awarding double costs have been discussed in Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29. The rationale for the rules discussed at para. 25 emphasizes that an award of double costs is a “punitive measure against a litigant for that party’s failure, in all of the circumstances, to have accepted an offer to settle that should have been accepted.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.