Can police proceed with charges on the basis of one witness's uncorroborated account of events?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Veeken v. Spratt, 2019 BCPC 204 (CanLII):

And in fact, police may proceed with charges on the basis of one witness’ uncorroborated account of events. If they proceed in this fashion, however, the claimant must then demonstrate that there was “overwhelming evidence” discrediting that witness, all in a context where at least generally speaking, questions of credibility and reliability are not the purview of the investigating officer, see George v. Guelph (City) Police Services, at para. 8. Likewise, the police are not under an obligation to take a statement from an accused. The decision to not take, nor attempt to take, a statement from an accused is routine, and in fact, since the claimant enjoys a constitutionally enshrined right to silence, there are significant legal and procedural hurdles to the lawful taking of a statement from an accused.

Other Questions


Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that some funds may have been transferred to the joint account of a joint account with a different bank account make up for the failure to plead or lead evidence on false statement and inducement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does issue estoppel create unfairness through according preclusive effect to the results of a prior proceeding in a subsequent proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a variation of an order regarding distribution of matrimonial home proceeds be varied based on subsequent events? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an unidentified police informer acting as an agent of the police when she entered the premises of two accused? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a strata charge back repair costs to the strata lot account? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a police officer proceed into a intersection with all emergency equipment? (British Columbia, Canada)
How much time has elapsed between February 7, 2005 and March 28, 2007 between the date of the charge and the date the charge was brought? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event occurred at the same time as an actual event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a general release under which a plaintiff agrees to reduce support in exchange for receiving the proceeds of the sale of a house sale proceeds? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.