As Belobaba J. explained in his reasons denying a Rule 45.02 order in the more recent case of 3Genius Corporation v. Locationary Inc., 2016 ONSC 4092, 268 A.C.W.S. (3d) 191 (at paras. 2-4), there are two parts to the question of “specific fund”: (i) is there a reasonably identifiable fund, and (ii) is the plaintiff claiming a legal right to the fund or just making a claim for damages? He concluded that even though there was an identifiable fund, the plaintiff’s claim was in essence only for damages. The Moving Parties’ claims are similarly in essence only for damages.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.