In elaborating on this point further, in Cummings v. Hitt, 2015 BCSC 530, Dickson J. of our court confirmed that the plaintiff need not prove future hypothetical events on a balance of probabilities. As long as the plaintiff can show a “real and substantial possibility” of future income loss and that such possibility is not mere speculation, she should be compensated.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.