Relying on Reibl v. Hughes, 1980 CanLII 23 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880, the defendant says the plaintiff must not only show that the physician failed to explain the material risks of the laminectomy procedure but also that this failure caused the alleged harm he seeks to be compensated for. The plaintiff must show that a reasonable person in his circumstances would not have consented to and undergone the procedure if fully informed of the risks.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.