In Iverson v. Onland, [1992] B.C.J. No. 1698 there was a claim for money owing on his truck which was used in the plaintiff’s business as a courier. Holmes J. stated at p. 14: I do not find the plaintiff's separate claim for a remaining balance owing after resale of his truck to be a compensable loss. It is a claim apparently based upon the plaintiff's impecuniosity which I find neither foreseeable nor resulted from the defendant's negligence. In my view the plaintiff was about to be terminated from employment as a courier at the time of the accident in any event and would have been without employment income. Further I am not satisfied the plaintiff made any reasonable attempt to alleviate short term financing difficulties by loan or lease postponement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.