In Drean, the damages settlement was in the form of an annuity. Mr. Justice Melvin held that the fact that the funds were converted into an annuity for purposes of providing compensation for the individual over his lifetime did not change the character of the payment, which, in essence, was compensation to the recipient personally for injuries suffered by him. Mr. Justice Melvin cited Starratt v. Starratt, [1995] B.C.J. No. 1147, in which it was held that funds received by a spouse from a personal injury settlement were hers personally, and could not be viewed as a family asset.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.