My analysis starts from the position that it is well settled law that a member of a pension plan is not entitled to distribution of surplus until the plan is terminated or partially terminated. Until termination, a surplus in a plan is a contingent unquantifiable interest: see Schmidt v. Air Products Ltd. [1994] 25 SCR 611. In order to succeed the plaintiffs will have to establish that the defendants had a duty to declare a partial termination and that the failure to do so caused them to suffer a loss. That loss will have to be calculated on the basis of the actual value of the surplus at the effective termination date and a determination of what portion of that value is related to the group being terminated.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.